Marmot in Grand Teton National Park


A marmot peers over boulders in Glacier Gulch of Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming.

On my way back down from Delta Lake last week, I was on the lookout for some new pika shots since the route back takes you through a large boulder field in Glacier Gulch of Grand Teton National Park. It’s the perfect place to find both pika and marmots thriving. While I wasn’t able to come away with any pika shots like I was hoping, I did catch this curious little marmot scrambling around nearby. He went through a number of different poses, and this was the one that I enjoyed the most.

Related Photos


Posted on August 3, 2010.
Posted in Wildlife. Tags: , , , .
Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • http://blog.hankchristensen.com Hank Christensen

    Mike – great shot. What length of lens did you use for this one? I’m always struggling to decide if I should lug my longer lenses around while hiking/backpacking, or just stick to my wide angles. Keep up the great shooting!

  • http://www.cavaroc.com Mike Cavaroc

    Thanks, Hank! This was taken with my 70-300mm. I tend to just put myself through a bit of torture whenever I go hiking/backpacking and bring both my 17-40mm and my 70-300mm. I’ve thought about investing in something like an 18-250mm that I’ve seen from Sigma which would eliminate switching lenses, and truthfully is probably a better way to go, but for now that’s what I’ve been doing.

  • http://blog.hankchristensen.com Hank Christensen

    Thanks for the info Mike. For backpacking, I usually take my 24-70 and sometimes my 17-40 (mainly for use at and around camp, or on day hikes when I can switch out lenses more easily). I’ve been contemplating hauling my 100-400 along, but I haven’t been able to justify it yet! A super zoom like the 18-250 seems ideal, but I have yet to find one that is compatible with full frame sensors. With a lens multiplier, 18 x 1.6 = 28.8, which just isn’t wide enough.

  • http://www.cavaroc.com Mike Cavaroc

    The 100-400 seems like it might be heavy, but at the same time I did see one guy last week with one. You’re right about that 18-250 lens though. I suppose in the end I’d still have to lug around two which puts me right back where I am now. I’d love to find a solution so that I wouldn’t have to keep switching out lenses though – especially out in the open!